USPTO serial 76239280
ENZYOMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADKINS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ENZYOMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Laurent, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1208Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing information in the field of scientific and medical research; laboratory research, scientific research, product research and development, pharmaceutical drug development, design and testing for new product development, development of new technology for others and product development consultation in the field of medical and scientific drug and enzyme usage, namely, rapid enzyme targets identification and validation with rational drug design of enzyme inhibitors, rational drug design of small molecule inhibitors and mRNA inhibitors or antisense oligonucleotide which is used to make compounds and drugs, which inhibit enzyme targets in-vitro and in animals or humans, functional genomics and proteomics, which provides information regarding a gene, enzyme or protein target combined with a multi-disciplinary process which relies on a combination of scientific competencies, including mechanistic enzymology and structure-based design, biophysics, x-ray crystallography, computational chemistry, computer-aided drug design, medicinal chemistry, combinatorial chemistry, molecular pharmacology, recombinant protein production, target assay development and functional assay development | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |