USPTO serial 76239470
SAFELINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAFELINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Poole, Dorset BH17 ORZ, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda S. Chan
LINDA S CHAN HELFGOTT & KARAS, PCEMPIRE STATE BLDG 60TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Gas detectors; sensors and sensor cartridges for detecting toxic, inflammable or hazardous gases; transmitters for use in gas detection; filters for use in gas detectors; a communication and calibration instrument for connection of two or more portable gas detectors/monitors allowing the communication of gas readings and instrument status between portable gas detectors/monitors and allowing for communication of messages between the portable gas detectors/monitors | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Calibration, maintenance, repairing and servicing of gas detecting apparatus and instruments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |