Drawing for RED CARPET COLORS

USPTO serial 76239641

RED CARPET COLORS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SPARACINO, MARK V
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RED CARPET COLORS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

LISA W ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP815 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-4078UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely, skin care cream, skin care milk, skin care lotion, cleansing milk, make-up remover, beauty mask, skin soap, facial wash, body shampoo, bath and shower gel, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair lotion, hair styling spray, hair treatment mousse, hair styling mousse, hair care preparations, hair styling preparations, hair dye, hair permanent preparation and hair coloring preparations, body powder, lipstick, lip gloss, lip liner, lip pencil, brow pencil, nail polish, eye shadow, eyeliner, mascara, under-eye concealer, foundation, facial powder, blush, perfume, cologne, eau de toiletteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 10, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 23, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 5, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 6, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 23, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 27, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance