Drawing for INFUSION DEVELOPMENT

USPTO serial 76239665

INFUSION DEVELOPMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2807725Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 27, 2004
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with INFUSION DEVELOPMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa Casey Spaniel

Lisa Casey Spaniel Blank Rome LLPOne Logan Square8th FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19103-6998

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer electronic software development tools for use in large scale enterprise systemsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 4, 2002
042computer software development, computer software consultation and computer software design for othersSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 31, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2024CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 27, 2023REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2018ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 24, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 16, 2013NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
May 16, 2013RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 16, 201389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
May 16, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 22, 2013E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Feb 3, 2010C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Feb 3, 2010APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 27, 2010E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2007CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 27, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 28, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 27, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 12, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 2003IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 11, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 26, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 26, 20021.BASec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED—
Aug 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 22, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance