Drawing for CHUAO

USPTO serial 76240145

CHUAO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3016370Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 15, 2005
Examiner
KING, LINDA M
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHUAO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Micol Cecchi

Micol Cecchi Adams and Reese LLP424 Church StreetSuite 2800Nashville, TN 37219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Chocolates, chocolate cream candy, chocolate Easter eggs, chocolate pralines and chocolate candy.SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 2008C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Nov 17, 2008CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 6, 2008CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Oct 30, 2008CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Sep 4, 2007PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Nov 15, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Nov 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 12, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 12, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 13, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 1, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance