USPTO serial 76240481
FUTURE COUNTRY FUTURE NATION FUTURE CITIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FUTURE COUNTRY FUTURE NATION FUTURE CITIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | LEGAL SERVICES | ACTIVE | Feb 7, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2008 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 2, 2007 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2007 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 25, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 21, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |