USPTO serial 76240763
METTLE - ORB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WILLIS, PAMELA Y
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with METTLE - ORB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MAURICE B PILOSOF
468 NO CAMDEN DR STE 244BEVERLY HILLLS, CA 90210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | HAIR CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SHAMPOOS, CONDITIONERS, TREATMENTS, MOISTURIZERS, COLORING PREPARATIONS, HAIRSPRAYS, HAIR STYLING CREAMS, GELS, AND COSMETICS, NAMELY, LIPSTICKS, BLUSH, FACE POWDERS, FOUNDATIONS, EYE MAKEUP, AND SKIN MOISTURIZERS | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | HANDBAGS, ALL-PURPOSE CARRYING BAGS, TRAVELING BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS, PURSES, WALLETS, COSMETIC BAGS SOLD EMPTY, BACKPACKS, ATHLETIC BAGS, AND UMBRELLAS | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | HOUSEWARES AND DINNERWARE, NAMELY, BEVERAGE GLASSES, BOWLS, COFFEE POTS NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, DISHES, CONTAINERS FOR HOUSEHOLD OR KITCHEN USE NOT OF PRECIOUS METAL, CUPS, FRYING PANS, PLATES, AND SERVING PLATTERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Compactus, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Compactus, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named METTLE - ORB
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 22, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 1, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 12, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 5, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |