USPTO serial 76240816
MAXIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London WIR 5LD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. deBrauwere
ROBERT J DEBRAUWERE JACOBS DEBRAUWERE & DEHN LLP445 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-2606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | jewelry, clocks, watches and watch accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 15, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |