USPTO serial 76240817
MAXIM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MAXIM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London WIR 5LD, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. deBrauwere
PETER M LANGRIND ESQ JACOBS DEBRAUWERE LLP17TH FL445 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | leather and imitation leather articles, namely, luggage, handbags, attache cases, purses, billfolds, business card cases, and key cases; umbrellas, parasols and walking sticks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 2, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 19, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |