Drawing for READING TOGETHER IS BETTER

USPTO serial 76241463

READING TOGETHER IS BETTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with READING TOGETHER IS BETTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michele P. Schwartz

MICHELE P SCHWARTZ HUGHES & LUCE LLP1717 MAIN STSTE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Training services, namely, providing courses of instruction in the field of a learning program for children in kindergarten, elementary and secondary schools; educational services, namely, conducting classes in the field of reading for children in kindergarten, elementary, and secondary schoolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 11, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance