Drawing for QUAL TRACE

USPTO serial 76241696

QUAL TRACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUAL TRACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lanning G. Bryer

LANNING G BRYER LADAS & PARRY26 W 61ST STNEW YORK, NY 10023-7604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computers, namely computer hardware; Computer software, namely for the configuration, integration, implementation and use with respect to quality control, inventory and supply chain systems in the dairy, food, pharmaceutical and life science industriesACTIVE—
035Business management, utilizing computers; inventory controlACTIVE—
041Computer education training servicesACTIVE—
042Computer software design for others; computer systems analysis; computer consultation, in the fields of computer hardware and software; computer programming for others; maintenance of computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 18, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 16, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 13, 2001CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 24, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance