USPTO serial 76241778
SOTERIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOTERIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James L. Scott
DAN KALINE SOTERIA CORP2668 EDWARD STJENISON, MI 49428UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS, COSMETICS, MOISTURIZERS AND TONERS, CREAMS, MILKS, LOTIONS, GELS AND POWDERS FOR THE FA ACE, BODY AND HANDS, BODY SOAPS, CLEANSERS, ESSENTIAL OILS, BATH OILS AND GELS, FRAGRANCES AND DEODORANTS, AFTER-SUN LOTIONS, SUN BLOCK AND SUNSCREEN PREPARATIONS | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | VITAMIN AND MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS; HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | AIR FILTERS FOR DOMESTIC USE; WATER FILTERING UNITS FOR DOMESTIC USE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |