Drawing for FLIGHT LITE

USPTO serial 76242340

FLIGHT LITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
THOMPSON, HEATHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLIGHT LITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Morgan L. Fitch, Jr.

MORGAN L FITCH JR FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LASALLE ST STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603-3406UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Free space optical networking devices, namely, free space optical transmitters, free space optical receivers and free space optical controllers for two way telecommunications transmissionsACTIVEFeb 14, 2001
038Telecommunications services, namely, providing information in the field of free-space optical networkingACTIVEFeb 14, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 6, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 2, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jun 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 10, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 10, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 3, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 30, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 25, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance