USPTO serial 76242340
FLIGHT LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FLIGHT LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morgan L. Fitch, Jr.
MORGAN L FITCH JR FITCH EVEN TABIN & FLANNERY120 S LASALLE ST STE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60603-3406UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Free space optical networking devices, namely, free space optical transmitters, free space optical receivers and free space optical controllers for two way telecommunications transmissions | ACTIVE | Feb 14, 2001 |
| 038 | Telecommunications services, namely, providing information in the field of free-space optical networking | ACTIVE | Feb 14, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 11, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |