USPTO serial 76242507
CONWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3012307Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 1, 2005
- Examiner
- KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CONWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
Mark I. Peroff Manatt Phelps & Phillips, LLPSeven Times SquareNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | skin clarifiers, cleansers, cream, emollients, lighteners, lotion, masks, moisturizer, scrubs, soaps and toners; non-medicated lip balm; shower gel; body firming gels and lotions, body cream, oil, emulsions, masks and scrubs; makeup; lipstick; lip gloss; lip pencils; nail polish; eye makeup; eye pencils; eyebrow pencils; blush; mascara; hand cream; foot cream; exfoliating body scrubs; sun block; after-sun lotions; self-tanning skin preparations; cuticle conditioners; facial cleansers, creams, emulsions, masks and scrubs; perfume; cologne; toilet water; eau de parfum; after-shave lotions; shaving cream; scented body spray; essential oils for personal use; personal deodorant; antiperspirant; makeup remover; toilet soap; bath beads, crystal, foam and gel; nail care preparations; hair care preparations; hair cleaning preparations; hair shampoo; aromatherapy oils; potpourri; room fragrances; dentifrices; mouthwash; whiteners for teeth; adhesives for cosmetic use; depilatories; cotton and cotton swabs, sticks and puffs for cosmetic purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 7, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 14, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 20, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |