USPTO serial 76242541
SDF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2690008Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 25, 2003
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SDF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-81675 Munchen, DE
D-81675 Munchen, DE
D-81675 Munchen, DE
MUNCHEN, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Karl M. Zielaznicki, Esq.
KARL M ZIELAZNICKI ESQ C/O TRADEMARK DOCKET CLERKTROUTMAN SANDERS LLP600 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5200ATLANTA, GA 30308-2216Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR COMPILATION, VERIFICATION, EDITING, CORRECTION AND MERGING OF ADDRESS AND PERSONAL DATA FROM DIFFERENT SOURCES IN THE FIELDS OF TELECOMMUNICATION AND PUBLISHING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | TRAINING IN THE USE OF SOFTWARE AND IN DATA PROCESSING; EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, CONDUCTING CLASSES, SEMINARS, CONFERENCES, WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF SOFTWARE APPLICABILITY AND DATA PROCESSING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | DEVELOPMENT, ADAPTION AND MAINTENANCE OF SOFTWARE FOR OTHERS; CONSULTATION IN THE FIELD OF SOFTWARE APPLICABILITY AND DATA PROCESSING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by varetis AG
- Other trademarks owned by varetis AG
- Other trademarks owned by varetis AG
- Other trademarks owned by VARETIS SOLUTIONS GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SDF
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |