USPTO serial 76242766
SECRET BARGAINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SECRET BARGAINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bradford S. Breen
BRADFORD S BREEN ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP666 5TH AVE RM 203NEW YORK, NY 10103-1798UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing on-line newsletters in the field of discount travel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 9, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |