Drawing for MAKE-UP FACTORY

USPTO serial 76243207

MAKE-UP FACTORY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAKE-UP FACTORY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAWRENCE D MANDEL

LAWRENCE D MANDEL MANDEL & PESLAK LLC80 SCENIC DR STE 5FREEHOLD, NJ 07728-5211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003cosmetics, namely, mascara, eyeliner, eyebrow and eyeshadow pencils, eyeshadow, lipliner pencils, face powder, foundation, liquid make-up, powder blusher, lipstick, lip gloss, nail care preparations namely, nail polish, skin care preparations, namely, skin toner, face and body moisturizers, night creams, day creams, skin tighteners, facial and body scrubsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 25, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 25, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 25, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 13, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 16, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 26, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 1, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 13, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance