USPTO serial 76243358
IFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey A. Smith
JEFFREY A SMITH MILLEN WHITE ZELANO & BRANIGAN PC2200 CLARENDON BLVD STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201-3331UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PRINTED EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS RELATING TO FIBER OPTICS, FIBER OPTIC MATERIALS, FIBER OPTIC EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS, FIBER OPTIC POLISHING TECHNIQUES; PRINTED MANUALS RELATING TO FIBER OPTICS, FIBER OPTIC MATERIALS, FIBER OPTIC EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS, FIBER OPTIC POLISHING TECHNIQUES; PRINTED INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS RELATING TO FIBER OPTICS, FIBER OPTIC MATERIALS, FIBER OPTIC EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS, FIBER OPTIC POLISHING TECHNIQUES; PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY BOOKS, BOOKLETS AND MAGAZINES RELATING TO FIBER OPTICS, FIBER OPTIC MATERIALS, FIBER OPTIC EQUIPMENT AND TOOLS, FIBER OPTIC POLISHING TECHNIQUES | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | MANUFACTURE OF FIBER OPTIC TOOLS, FIBER OPTIC EQUIPMENT, FIBER OPTIC POLISHING PUCKS, FIBER OPTIC ABRASIVE CLOTH TO THE ORDER AND/OR SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 14, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |