USPTO serial 76244382
VIBRA-PAK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOAGNI, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIBRA-PAK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John V. Forcier
MIGUEL C DANIELSON GOODWIN PROCTER LLPEXCHANGE PL 53 STATE STATTN TRADEMARK ADMINISTRATORBOSTON, MA 02109Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | fluid filled bladder for vibration dampening of machine workpieces for use in machining operations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |