Drawing for MANDEL LASER VISION

USPTO serial 76244953

MANDEL LASER VISION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANDEL LASER VISION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward M. Weisz

EDWARD M WEISZ COHEN PONTANI LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 5TH AVE RM 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176-1299UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Ophthalmologic services to treat eye and vision deficiencies with refractive surgeryACTIVEApr 20, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 15, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 9, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 1, 2003CRTPREG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY—
Mar 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Jun 27, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Mar 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2002CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance