USPTO serial 76245051
JORDAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with JORDAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Northamptonshire, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1208Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | LEATHER SOLD IN BULK AND LEATHER ARTICLES, NAMELY, LEATHER BAGS, KEY CHAINS, SHOPPING BAGS, WALLETS, PURSES, BRIEFCASES, TRUNKS AND TRAVELLING BAGS, LUGGAGE, SPORTS BAGS AND RUCKSACKS; LUGGAGE TRUNKS AND TRAVELING BAGS; UMBRELLAS; WALKING STICKS; LUGGAGE; BRIEFCASES; RUCKSACKS AND ALL PURPOSE SPORTS BAGS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY, APRONS, BATHROBES, SANDALS, SLIPPERS, BEACH CLOTHES, BELTS, BOOTS, UNDERWEAR, COATS, JACKETS, JERSEYS, TROUSERS, SOCKS, PAJAMAS, SCARVES, SHAWLS, STOCKINGS, SWIMWEAR, T-SHIRTS; KNITWEAR, NAMELY, PULLOVERS; FOOTWEAR; AND HEADGEAR, NAMELY, CAPS, HATS AND HEADBANDS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |