USPTO serial 76245131
NUTRI-GEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUTRI-GEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Chicago, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A. BACON
JOHN A BACON BAKER & MCKENZIEONE PRUDENTIAL PLZ130 E RANDOLPH DR STE 3500CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | nutritional supplement for human consumption | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |