Drawing for PAYGENT

USPTO serial 76245396

PAYGENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WAHLBERG, STACY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PAYGENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael D. Johns, Esq.

Kathryn K. Przywara Dinsmore & Shohl LLP255 East Fifth Street1900 Chemed CenterCincinnati, OH 45202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT AND BUSINESS TRANSACTION PAYMENT DATAACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 29, 2004ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2004REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 10, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 10, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 20, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 6, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 6, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 6, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 31, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 19, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance