Drawing for JERUSALEM VENTURE PARTNERS

USPTO serial 76245420

JERUSALEM VENTURE PARTNERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2984433Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 16, 2005
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JERUSALEM VENTURE PARTNERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald E. Shapiro

RONALD E SHAPIRO SHAPIRO AND SILVERSTEIN PLLC11350 RANDOM HILLS ROADSUITE 740FAIRFAX, VA 22030

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising agency services, co-operative advertising and marketing services, business marketing consultation services, preparation of custom advertisement and custom promotional products for others, preparing promotional and merchandising material for others; promoting the goods and services of others through the distribution of printed material and promotional contests; preparation of marketing strategy for othersSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 19, 1997
036venture capital services, namely, providing financing to emerging start-up companiesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDJun 19, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 4, 2014C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Feb 4, 2014CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 28, 2014CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 23, 2013PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 22, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Mar 22, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Feb 15, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2005R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 24, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 4, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 27, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 5, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 21, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 31, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance