USPTO serial 76245519
LEG ART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEG ART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
COLLEEN MORRISON
COLLEEN MORRISON MARKS & CLERK280 SLATER ST STE 1800OTTAWA, ON K1P 1C2CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Hosiery items namely, pantyhose, stockings, leggings, tights, socks and leotards | ACTIVE | Jan 11, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 22, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 20, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |