Drawing for WONDER COMMUNICATIONS

USPTO serial 76245861

WONDER COMMUNICATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
WHITE, RICHARD F
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WONDER COMMUNICATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen J. Strauss

STEPHEN J STRAUSS FULWIDER PATTON LEE & UTECHT LLP6060 CTR DR FL 10LOS ANGELES, CA 90045-1598UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009PRE-RECORDED PHONOGRAPH RECORDS, COMPACT DISCS, ANALOG AND DIGITAL AUDIO TAPE CASSETTES AND MINI DISCS FEATURING MUSIC; PRE-RECORDED VIDEODISCS AND VIDEO TAPES, AND CD-ROMS FEATURING MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT; DOWNLOADABLE MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS; DOWNLOADABLE VIDEO RECORDINGS FEATURING MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT; AND DOWNLOADABLE ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS IN THE NATURE OF MAGAZINES AND NEWSLETTERS IN THE FIELD OF MUSIC AND ENTERTAINMENT; AND SUNGLASSESACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDโ€”
Jan 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDโ€”
Aug 3, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDโ€”
Jul 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRSโ€”
Jul 8, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDโ€”
Jul 8, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDโ€”
Jan 5, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDโ€”
Jan 5, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 22, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDโ€”
Aug 21, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTEDโ€”
Aug 21, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDโ€”
Jun 4, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
May 18, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Jan 9, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Jul 9, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Nov 30, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Oct 2, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Jul 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance