USPTO serial 76245987
MCDRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAN HORN, TAWANDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MCDRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald N. Huff
DONALD N HUFF DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1300 I ST NW 3RD FL WWASHINGTON, DC 20005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | DEHUMIDIFIERS FOR DRYING THE INTERIOR CASES WITHIN WHICH CAMERAS OR LIKE WATER-SENSITIVE PRODUCTS ARE STORED | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | HYGROMETERS | ABANDONED | — |
| 020 | DISPLAY CASES OF METAL; NON-METALLIC DISPLAY CASES, NON-METALLIC BINS; NON-METALLIC CABINETS, CHESTS, DISPLAY STANDS, RACKS AND SHELVES FOR STORAGE | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by EKUARUSHI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks owned by EKUARUSHI KABUSHIKI KAISHA
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named MCDRY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2003 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |