USPTO serial 76246075
BBWOMAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BBWOMAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEPHEN L BAKER
Stephen L Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, tops, sweaters, jackets, pants, suits, bottoms, socks, hats and caps; shoes; shorts, coats, neckties, underwear, vests, robes, hosiery, skirts, dresses, loungewear, scarves, rainwear, trousers, ascots, ties, outer shirts namely evening, dress, polo, and sports shirts, collars, pajamas, robes, smoking jackets, dressing gowns, mufflers, gloves, hose, belts, suspenders, garters, boots, slippers, shoes, overshoes, beach wear, swimwear, formal wear, namely jackets, pants, suits, shirts, shoes, cummerbunds, ties, suspenders and gowns | ABANDONED | — |
| 035 | Retail store services and computerized online ordering and retail services via a computer network featuring a wide variety of consumer goods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |