USPTO serial 76246219
MICROUNITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 21, 2006
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MICROUNITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA
Other trademarks owned by MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
Santa Clara, CA
Other trademarks owned by MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
Los Altos, CA
Other trademarks owned by MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Y. Kim,
Richard Y. Kim, MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY600 13TH STREET, N.W.WASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing information in the fields of computer hardware and software and semiconductors; providing consulting in computer hardware and software, broadband communications and semiconductors; licensing of intellectual property; and designing, developing and programming for others computer software, communications platforms, and computer subsystems for use in voice, video and data signals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MicroUnity Systems Engineering, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MICROUNITY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 21, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 20, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 10, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 31, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 25, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |