USPTO serial 76246401
THOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dolly KAO
BRUCE A TASSAN TASSAN & HARDISON4143 27TH ST NARLINGTON, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Materials handling and processing equipment for use in the mining and quarry industry, namely, conveyor systems comprised of transfer conveyors, troughing conveyors and telescopic conveyors | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 1969 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 10, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |