Drawing for BCFCM

USPTO serial 76246456

BCFCM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BCFCM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Billie Jean Smith

Billie Jean Smith Boyle Fredrickson, S.C.840 N Plankinton AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic control module for commercial refrigerationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 14, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 14, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 16, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 3, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance