USPTO serial 76246766
ISSA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ISSA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip Furgang
Philip Furgang Furgang & Adwar, L.L.P.1325 Avenue of the Americas28th FloorNew York, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, lipstick, mascara, eye shadow, compact powder, eye liner, foundation, eye pencil, concealer, bronzing powder, lip gloss, lip liner, foundation make-up, body lotion, body cream, bath oil, bath beads, shampoo, hair conditioner, bath soap, shower and bath gel, bubble bath; perfume; namely, perfume and toilet water | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | accessories, namely, jewelry, namely earrings, bracelets, necklaces, and brooches, and costume jewelry in general | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | leather goods, namely, leather key fobs, hand bags, purses, wallets, suitcases, briefcases, all purpose sports bags, travel bags, dog collars and dog clothing | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing for men, women and children, namely skirts, pants, hats, coats, jackets, jeans and belts, and leather gloves | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | online retail store services featuring cosmetics, perfumes, lifestyle and fashion books, household products, clothing and accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HELAYEL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HELAYEL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ISSA
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 15, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 3, 2009 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 9, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 6, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 26, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 9, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |