USPTO serial 76246905
HOME THEATER TUNE-UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOME THEATER TUNE-UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hachette Filipacchi Magazines, Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Hachette Filipacchi Magazines, Inc.
Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S., Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S., Inc.
Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S., Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S., Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul J. Reilly
PAUL J REILLY BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZ FL 44NEW YORK, NY 10112-4498UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cables, connectors, lens cleaners, disc cleaners for audio, video and home theater equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hachette Filipacchi Magazines, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Hachette Filipacchi Media U.S., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named HOME THEATER TUNE-UP
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 27, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |