USPTO serial 76246906
SOUND & VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOUND & VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HACHETTE FILIPACCHI MEDIA, U.S., INC.
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by HACHETTE FILIPACCHI MEDIA, U.S., INC.
HACHETTE FILIPACCHI MEDIA, U.S., INC.
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by HACHETTE FILIPACCHI MEDIA, U.S., INC.
Hachette Filipacchi Magazines, Inc.
New York, NY
Other trademarks owned by Hachette Filipacchi Magazines, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAUL J REILLY
PAUL J REILLY BAKER BOTTS LLP30 ROCKEFELLER PLZNEW YORK, NY 10112UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Cables, connectors, lens cleaners, disc cleaners for audio, video and home theater equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HACHETTE FILIPACCHI MEDIA, U.S., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HACHETTE FILIPACCHI MEDIA, U.S., INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Hachette Filipacchi Magazines, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named SOUND & VISION
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 24, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 7, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |