USPTO serial 76246946
ZEPTOVIEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZEPTOVIEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CH-4108 Witterswil, CH
CH-4108 Witterswil, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK A. WRIGHT,
MARK A WRIGHT MCLANE, GRAF, RAULERSON & MIDDLETON900 ELM STMANCHESTER, NH 03105-0326UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software used for laboratory, medical, and veterinary applications, namely, computer software used for identifying, filtering, quantifying and analyzing data from biochip images and controlling and automating the production, identification, assaying, imaging and analysis of biochips; computer software used for study design, namely, design of experimental conditions; used for biochip design, namely, choice of recognition elements and their geometrical deposition on a biochip; used for assay design, namely, design of assay architecture and conditions, and used for data analysis from biochip images; computer software for the generation of databases and libraries, input of biochip data into databases and libraries, and interfacing with external databases and libraries for the correlation of analytical data with results from biological or pharmalogical studies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 18, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |