USPTO serial 76246983
TUTIFRUTTI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TUTIFRUTTI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert F. Zielinski
Robert F. Zielinski Buchanan, Ingersoll & Rooney PCP.O. Box 1404Alexandria, VA 22314-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | fresh fruits and vegetables | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |