Drawing for VERTICALSOFT

USPTO serial 76247292

VERTICALSOFT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEIMER, CAROLINE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VERTICALSOFT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patrick J. O'Shea

PATRICK J O'SHEA SAMUELS, GAUTHIER & STEVENS LLP225 FRANKLIN ST STE 3300BOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SOFTWARE FOR PLANNING, SCHEDULING, DESIGNING, CONTROLLING THE PRODUCTION AND QUALITY, AND MANAGING PROCESS MANUFACTURING, USED BY THE PROCESS MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY, AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD AS A UNIT THEREWITHACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 27, 2006PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 1, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 8, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 21, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 21, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 10, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 21, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 5, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 21, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 6, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 1, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance