USPTO serial 76247640
TITAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TITAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John Crosetto
John Crosetto BUCHALTER, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION1420 Fifth AvenueSuite 3100SEATTLE, WA 98101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | hand tools namely, lighted utility knives, lighted screwdrivers, pliers, lock grip pliers, ratchet wrenches, hex key wrenches, sockets, screwdrivers, wrenches, hand drill bits, power drill bits, bit drivers, hand tools namely, socket sets, pocket knives, lighted pocket knives, and/or led flashlights; hand jacks; stands for hand jacks; hand operated lighted engine cranes for lifting automotive engines; hand tools namely, wrenches sold as a set, socket sets, pliers sold as a set, screwdrivers sold as a set; hand tool kits for the household consumer market comprised of lighted utility knives, tape measures, lighted tape measures, lighted carpenter levels, carpenter levels, carpenter laser levels, lighted laser carpenter levels, lighted screwdrivers, pliers, lock grip pliers, ratchet wrenches, hex key wrenches, sockets, screwdrivers, wrenches, hand drill bits, power drill bits, bit drivers, hand tools namely, socket sets, pocket knives, lighted pocket knives, and/or led flashlights; hand jacks; stands for hand jacks; hand operated lighted engine cranes for lifting automotive engines; hand tools namely, wrenches sold as a set, socket sets, pliers sold as a set, screwdrivers sold as a set | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2020 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| May 22, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 22, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2020 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 19, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 25, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |