USPTO serial 76248311
3 DAY BLINDS & SHUTTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAPSHAW, DANIEL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 3 DAY BLINDS & SHUTTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitch Milstein
MITCH MILSTEIN RUTAN & TUCKER LLP611 ANTON BLVD 14TH FLCOSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | WINDOW COVERINGS, NAMELY MINI BLINDS, VERTICAL BLINDS, PLEATED SHADES, WOOD BLINDS AND SHUTTERS, AND PARTS THEREOF | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 3, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |