Drawing for SPILL PROTECTOR

USPTO serial 76248389

SPILL PROTECTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPILL PROTECTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph A. Kolasch

JOSEPH A KOLASCH BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Refrigerators; refrigerator parts, namely glass shelvesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2002ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Oct 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 4, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance