USPTO serial 76248444
MAGNA DRYZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 22, 2003
- Examiner
- LEE, DOUGLAS
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAGNA DRYZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
H. H. Brown Shoe Technologies, Inc.
Greenwich, CT
Other trademarks owned by H. H. Brown Shoe Technologies, Inc.
H. H. Brown Shoe Technologies, Inc.
Greenwich, CT
Other trademarks owned by H. H. Brown Shoe Technologies, Inc.
H. H. Brown Shoe Technologies, Inc.
Greenwich, CT
Other trademarks owned by H. H. Brown Shoe Technologies, Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Chen
David Chen IP Attorneys Group LLCSuite 3A57 Plains RoadMilford, CT 06841Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | FOOTWEAR, INSOLES AND SPORTS APPAREL, NAMELY, GLOVES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by H. H. Brown Shoe Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by H. H. Brown Shoe Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by H. H. Brown Shoe Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named MAGNA DRYZ
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 22, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 14, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |