Drawing for VELOCIUM

USPTO serial 76248492

VELOCIUM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VELOCIUM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan Kupersmith Larkin

JOAN KUPERSMITH LARKIN SEYFARTH SHAWONE CENTURY PLZ2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 3300LOS ANGELES, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS FOR TELECOMMUNICATION APPLICATIONS, NAMELY, INTEGRATED PHOTORECEIVERS, TRANSIMPEDANCE AMPLIFIERS, MODULATOR DRIVERS, AUTOMATIC GAIN CONTROL UNITS, CLOCK AND DATA RECOVERY/DEMULTIPLEXER CIRCUITS, CLOCK MULTIPLIER/MULTIPLEXER CIRCUITS, MIXER AND HIGH-SPEED DIGITAL RECEIVER CHIPS, MIXERS AND MODULATORS; INDIUM PHOSPHIDE CHIPS; SEMICONDUCTORS FOR USE IN THE TELECOMMUNICATION INDUSTRY; AND SEMICONDUCTOR WAFERSACTIVE—
042CUSTOM DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT AND TESTING OF TELECOMMUNICATION COMPONENTS FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 27, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 6, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Apr 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 28, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 5, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 5, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 31, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 28, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance