USPTO serial 76248716
LUKA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HICKEY,TONI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUKA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Birmingham, AL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen F. Humphreys
STEPHEN F HUMPHREYS STEPHEN F HUMPHREYS, PC110 HOMESTEAD DRATHENS, GA 30605UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF ON-GOING RADIO PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF VARIETY, FEATURING LUKA CARSEN, AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A RADIO PROGRAM IN THE FIELD OF VARIETY VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, FEATURING LUKA CARSEN, AND RADIO ENTERTAINMENT PRODUCTION, AND PRODUCTION OF RADIO AND TELEVISION PROGRAMS, AND ENTERTAINMENT IN THE NATURE OF ONGOING TELEVISION PROGRAMS IN THE FIELD OF VARIETY, FEATURING LUKA CARSEN, AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A TELEVISION PROGRAM IN THE FIELD OF VARIETY VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, FEATURING LUKA CARSEN | ACTIVE | Jul 4, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |