USPTO serial 76248743
H2O FUEL INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with H2O FUEL INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard A. Flynt
RICHARD A FLYNT ROYLANCE ABRAMS BERDO & GOODMAN LLP1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036-1649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | FUEL CONVERSION SYSTEMS COMPRISED PRIMARILY OF ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS, MANIFOLDS, ACTUATORS, SENSORS, WIRING HARNESS, AND HOSES FOR INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES USED IN BUSES, TRUCKS, AUTOMOBILES, GENERATOR SETS, MINING AND LOGGING VEHICLES, AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS AND TRACTORS, STREET AND ROAD CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE VEHICLES, MARINE VESSELS AND RAILWAY VEHICLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | TRAINING SERVICES FOR FUEL CONVERSION SYSTEMS FOR DIESEL AND GASOLINE | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | ENGINEERING AND CONSULTING SERVICES FOR FUEL CONVERSION SYSTEMS FOR DIESEL AND GASOLINE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |