USPTO serial 76248772
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chester Rothstein
CHESTER ROTHSTEIN AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | luminous and mechanical advertising panels and boards | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | providing retail store services featuring luminous and mechanical advertising sign panels and boards; rental and leasing services for luminous and mechanical advertising sign panels and boards | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | delivery of luminous and mechanical advertising sign panels and boards by boat, truck, and rail | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |