USPTO serial 76248908
WE HAVE A GIFT FOR INSPIRATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3130190Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 15, 2006
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WE HAVE A GIFT FOR INSPIRATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stacy J. Grossman, Esq.
Stacy J. Grossman, Esq. News America Incorporated1211 Avenue of the AmericasNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Gift books containing quotes, poetry, and prose combined with Bible scripture, book and bible covers, perpetual calendars, paper gift bags, note pads, photo albums and journals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Zondervan Corporation L.L.C., The
- Other trademarks owned by Zondervan Corporation, The
- Other trademarks owned by Zondervan Corporation, The
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named WE HAVE A GIFT FOR INSPIRATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 15, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 26, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 21, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 8, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |