Drawing for BEHIND THE HAIR

USPTO serial 76249071

BEHIND THE HAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWELL, LINDA
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BEHIND THE HAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marie V. Driscoll

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair spray, hair lotions and hair gelsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 11, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jul 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 21, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2003EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 24, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 12, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 25, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 10, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 25, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 2, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 12, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance