Drawing for ICT INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 76249104

ICT INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2783607Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Nov 18, 2003
Examiner
THOMPSON, LAVERNE
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ICT INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Baila H. Celedonia

BAILA H CELEDONIA COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN1133 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-6799UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009INFORMATION AND GOODS DISPLAY DEVICES, NAMELY, CONTROL DEVICES FOR ELECTRONIC PICTURE STANDS, MONITORS, PROJECTORS, SOUND AND IMAGE CARRYING DEVICES IN THE NATURE OF ELECTRONIC VIDEO AND DATA RECORDING, MEMORY AND STORAGE APPARATUS, REPRODUCTION APPARATUS, NAMELY, PROJECTORS, HOLOGRAPHIC SCREENS, LED WALLS, VIDEO WALL SYSTEMS COMPRISING OF VIDEO CUBES AND PLASMA SCREENS, LIGHTING CONTROL PANELS AND LIGHTING CONTROLLERS, CONTROL PANELS AND CONTROLLERS FOR MOVEMENT AND SIMULATION OF FUNCTIONS OF THE GOODS DISPLAYEDSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
035PREPARING AUDIO-VISUAL PRODUCT PRESENTATIONS FOR USE IN ADVERTISING AND ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING OF ADVERTISING EVENTSSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
042DEVELOPMENT OF COMPUTER SOFTWARESECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 26, 2010C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Apr 4, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 18, 2003R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Aug 26, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 16, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 20031.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Apr 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 1, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 29, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 5, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance