USPTO serial 76249138
GOD DON'T MAKE NO JUNK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOD DON'T MAKE NO JUNK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence A. Maxham
LAWRENCE A MAXHAM THE MAXHAM FIRMSYMPHONY TOWERS750 B ST STE 3100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE-RECORDED VIDEOS AND COMPACT DISCS FEATURING EDUCATIONAL AND METAPHYSICAL MESSAGES ON INSPIRATIONAL AND MOTIVATIONAL SUBJECTS | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 31, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 3, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 7, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |