USPTO serial 76249172
GOD DON'T MAKE NO JUNK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WINTER, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOD DON'T MAKE NO JUNK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence A. Maxham
LAWRENCE A MAXHAM THE MAXHAM FIRMSYMPHONY TOWERS750 B ST STE 3100SAN DIEGO, CA 92101Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | FICTIONAL AND NON-FICTIONAL BOOKS IN THE FIELD OF INSPIRATION AND MOTIVATION; MEDIATION CARDS; BUMPER STICKERS; CALENDARS; NOTEBOOKS; WRITING JOURNALS CONTAINING INSPIRATIONAL AND MOTIVATIONAL MESSAGES | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |